完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 劉靜敏 | |
| dc.contributor.other | Ching-Ming Liu | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-25T06:58:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-25T06:58:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012/10/24 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1682-587N | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.fcu.edu.tw/handle/2376/2468 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 洪芻《香譜》為今存北宋最早、也是保存比較完整的香藥譜錄類著作，其中對於歷代用香史料、用香方法、以及各種合香配方，均廣而收羅之；並首創用香事項之分類模式為：香之品、香之異、香之事、香之法等四大類別，為其後各家香譜所依循。_x000D_ 《香譜》的作者，雖從宋以來多視此譜為洪芻所作，但《郡齋讀書志》提出與所傳洪芻《香譜》內容略異的疑點、明陶宗儀《說郛》提出為唐人所撰，以及清《四庫全書總目提要》認為似非洪芻所撰等，對於作者的問題仍須釐清；此外各傳本流傳的卷次與內容差異，仍有待更進一步的探究。_x000D_ 本文先從《香譜》眾多作者中，如：唐人所撰、可能為侯氏《萱堂香譜》等說法，考訂為洪芻所撰寫，並從洪芻生平事蹟之研究，兼論洪芻撰寫此譜的可能性。其次，針對《香譜》的流傳及其版本問題探討，如：《百川學海》本、《唐宋叢書》本、《格致叢書》本、《說郛》本《學津討源》本與《名人小說》本等比較，並論述體例與內容特色。_x000D_ 《香譜》所屬譜錄類書籍，係因應社會需求而產生，雖乏文學創作之藝術性，但具有保存文獻、整理編纂之功。作為觀看宋代社會文化之現象而言，《香譜》的出現反映宋代香事高度發展的真實現況與價值取向；而洪芻的《香譜》正是此一系列發展的奠基者。 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | 逢甲大學 | |
| dc.format.extent | 44 | |
| dc.language.iso | 中文 | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 逢甲人文社會學報 | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 第十二期 | |
| dc.subject | 香譜 | |
| dc.subject | 洪芻 | |
| dc.subject | 版本 | |
| dc.subject | 譜錄 | |
| dc.subject | 香文化 | |
| dc.subject.other | Xiangpu | |
| dc.subject.other | Hong Chu | |
| dc.subject.other | version | |
| dc.subject.other | pulu | |
| dc.subject.other | culture of fragrance | |
| dc.title | 宋洪芻及其《香譜》研究 | |
| dc.title.alternative | Hong Chu and His Xiangpu | |
| dc.type | 期刊篇目 | |
| dc.description.translationabstract | Hong Chu’s Xiangpu is the earliest and the most complete collection of fragrance during the Northern Song Dynasty. The guide introduces the history, usage, prescription of fragrance, and categorizes matters concerning fragrance into “quality of fragrance,” “specialty of fragrance,” “affairs of fragrance,” and “rules of_x000D_ fragrance,” which provides a guideline to subsequent collections._x000D_ Hong Chu has been considered to be the author of Xiangpu since the Song Dynasty, but Jun Zhai Du Shu Zhi proposed questionable points. Tao Zong-yi_x000D_ （Ming） suggested that it was written by an author of the Tang Dynasty, and Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu Ti Yao suggested that it was not written by Hong Chu. The author of the book remains a question. The contents vary in different versions, which need to be studied further._x000D_ This paper examines the possible authors of Xiangpu, such as an author of the Tang Dynasty, Hou Xuan-tang, Hong Chu and so on. The life of Hong Chu is also studied to find out the likelihood of him being the author. Then, it probes into the circulation of Xiangpu and its versions, such as Bai Chuan Xue Ha, Tang Song Cong_x000D_ Shu, Ge Zhi Cong Shu, Shuo Fu, Xue Jin Tao Yuan, and Ming Ren Xiao Shuo versions, and discusses their styles and features._x000D_ Xiangpu is a pulu produced in response of the demand of the society but lack of the artistic approach to creative literature. However, it owns credits of archival preservation and organization. In terms of the social phenomenon of the Song Dynasty, the production of Xiangpu reflects the development and values of the fragrance. Hong Chu’s Xiangpu is indeed the foundation to the development of the culture of fragrance. | |
| 分類: | 第12期 | |
在 DSpace 系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。